Math 252 HW#07 sec. 4.4 #7 Maple Work

You were not asked to do any Maple work on this problem. However, it is instructive to calculate the line integral using Maple's "brute force" method, and compare to what we obtained using the potential method.

We start by loading the "linalg" package:

  with(linalg):
Now let's define G and work out the line integral:

  G:=vector([(1+x)*exp(x+y),x*exp(x+y)+2*z,-2*y]);
         G := [(1 + x) exp(x + y), x exp(x + y) + 2 z, -2 y]
  x:=(1-t)*exp(t);
                         x := (1 - t) exp(t)
  y:=t;
                                y := t
  z:=2*t;
                               z := 2 t
  R:=vector([x,y,z]);
                    R := [(1 - t) exp(t), t, 2 t]
  dR:=map(diff,R,t);
                dR := [-exp(t) + (1 - t) exp(t), 1, 2]
  dR:=map(simplify,dR);
                       dR := [-exp(t) t, 1, 2]
  intgr1:=dotprod(G,dR);
  intgr1 := (-1 - exp(t) + exp(t) t) exp(x + y) exp(t) t

     + exp(t) exp(x + y) - exp(t) exp(x + y) t + 4 t - 4 y
  intgr1:=simplify(intgr1);
  intgr1 := -2 t exp(exp(t) - exp(t) t + 2 t)

     - t exp(exp(t) - exp(t) t + 3 t)

        2
     + t  exp(exp(t) - exp(t) t + 3 t) + exp(exp(t) - exp(t) t + 2 t)
Pretty horrendous looking!!!

  int(intgr1,t=0..1);
                               -exp(1)
Nice simple answer though.

This confirms the answer obtained by using the potential method. Obviously the potential method is a whole lot easier than trying to evaluate the above horrendous integral by hand!


SFU / Math & Stats / ~hebron / math252 / assignments / sol07 / maple / 4.4.7.html

Revised 22 March 1999 by John Hebron.